Pesquisar este blog

sexta-feira, 18 de maio de 2012

John Edwards Facing Toughest Vote of Life

John Edwards is facing the biggest vote of his life as the case against the former president candidate is expected to be given to the North Carolina jury this morning.
Edwards, 58, could be hit with a prison term as high as 30 and fined up to $1.5 million if convicted of all the charges, although it is unlikely he would be hit with the most severe penalty.
The two time presidential candidate for the presidency is charged with using nearly $1 million in donations to hide his mistress Rielle Hunter and their love child during his bid for the 2008 election.
Federal Judge Catherine Eagles will finish charging the jury this morning and the panel will retire to begin its deliberations.
The jury consists of nine men and seven women and includes four alternates.
In closing arguments, Edwards' lawyer Abbe Lowell told the jury that the money to hide his mistress came from former campaign treasurer Fred Baron and elderly supporter Rachel "Bunny" Mellon. Both people gave him the money as a gift for his benefit, not as part of his political campaign.
And the money, Lowell argued, was used to hide the affair from Edwards' wife, Elizabeth, who was dying of cancer.
"John was a bad husband, but there is not the remotest chance that John did or intended to violate the law," Lowell said.
"If what John did was a crime, we'd better build a lot more court rooms, hire a lot more prosecutors and build a lot more jails," he said.
Lowell said the real culprit was Edwards' aide Andrew Young who helped hide Hunter. He claimed that Young solicited the money from Mellon and used the scandal to enrich himself. Lowell said Young, who was the prosecution's chief witness, and his wife Cheri would "shame Bonnie and Clyde."
Prosecutor Robert Higdon tried to convince the jury that Edwards was an archly ambitious politician fixated on obtaining a higher office.
"He would deny, deceive and manipulate," Higdon told the jury. "The whole scheme was cooked up to support John Edwards' political ambitions."
Neither Edwards nor Hunter took the stand during the month long trial.

By JAMES HILL and RUSSELL GOLDMAN | ABC OTUS News

Facebook IPO Probably Will Not Affect You

 

zuckerberg-facebook-ipo-illo.jpgLadies and gentlemen of the Internet, all your sharing of personal information and photos of your children and harsh opinions about the Kardashians is about to pay off bigtime. For a handful of insiders who owned private shares of Facebook before the company's ginormous IPO this Friday. "As a Facebook user, give yourself a pat on the back for helping the company make it this far. You are one of 900 million, and you spend an average of 20 minutes per day surfing the network. You've become worth an average of $100 to the company," says Mashable, which among much other coverage has created a nifty Facebook-style Timeline graphic about the IPO (on the premise that "if the Facebook IPO were a real person, we certainly wouldn't blame it for posting braggy status updates.") Crazily, the folks at Inc. seemed to have a really similar idea. Mashable analyzes "13 Ways the IPO Could Affect You." Most of them seem to be about the company's future imperative to keep growing at an unbelievable rate to please Wall Street, a drive that could lead to various money-making schemes: "Recently, Facebook indicated that only 12% of your friends see your average update.... users might even need to pay to get more visibility on their updates."
facebook flag.jpgThe fear that Facebook might begin billing us to expose ourselves has created at least one ancillary boondoggle. Reports Naked Security: "A hoax claiming that Facebook is planning to start charging users continues to spread across the social network, and has now been adapted by mischief-makers into a claim that the service will be free if users forward a message before midnight." Everybody has a scheme where fistfulls of dollars are involved. Look at poor Eduardo Saverin, a where-are-they now Facebook co-founder who seems to be doing just fine. Reports Inc.: "Depending on what happens when the IPO launches, Saverin could get more than $3 billion. As an American, he might have owed about a billion in capital gains tax, but he won't owe any now because he decided to renounce his American citizenship." Saverin insisted his national carpetbagging move isn't about the taxes, really! He said "I was born in Brazil, I was an American citizen for about 10 years. I thought of myself as a global citizen." VentureBeat says: "I don't really buy his logic. Captain Planet is a global citizen. He's also a hero who's going to take pollution down to zero. Saverin is a billionaire with a Harvard economics degree who lives in capitalist-friendly Singapore."
Facebook infographic.jpgOf course there is the main man, CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who stands to make at least a billion zillion dollars. He's been the subject a growing catalog of reverential literature. Betabeat has assembled links to "documents concerning St. Zuckerberg of Palo Alto," pronouncing: "Future generations may treasure bits of mystic St. Zuck's Hoodie cloth in jewel cases. They might even pray over them for hearty harvests of 'likes' and 'shares' of their next paid highlight status. " Some people - well Om Malik at OM.co anyway - are congratulating themselves simply for writing about Zuck before he was famous : "At the end of 2004, I pitched my editors at Business 2.0 a story on Facebook, which at that time was known as Thefacebook.com. I was super excited about Facebook." Gosh!
Ah, at least the halo effect has been generous, spreading to some other tech companies. "Some investors are looking for ancillary ways to profit from it," reports AllThingsD. "Shares of LinkedIn, Zynga, Pandora, and Yelp have all been trading up in advance of Facebook's IPO."
Zuckerberg the Musical.jpgOf course all most outsiders can do is gawk, or make musical parody videos. Zuckerberg: the Musical, made by those "History of whistling video" people, is pretty funny, says WebProNews: "Highlights include the segment that deals with the invention of the 'Like' button. For my money, it's hard to compete with the following: "I can like anything better than you." "No you can't." "Yes I can." "No you can't." "Yes I can." "No you can't." "YES I MOTHERF***ING CAN!""
You know what would be cool? One. Billion. Dollars. No, what really would be cool is A WHOLE MOVIE about Zuckerberg. Wait - that's already been done? Oh yeah, the one with the Dragon Tattoo Girl in it. Now the screenwriter who wrote that Facebook movie, Aaron Sorkin, is switching up tech saints to do a film about Steve Jobs. Perez Hilton tellz: "Sony picked up the rights to Walter Issacson's authorized biography of the technology wizard and officially announced today that the Social Network screenwriter will be adapting it for the big screen. Much like Armegeddon and Deep Impact...Hollywood has TWO movies about the Apple co-founder in the works. This particular project does NOT star Ashton Kutcher, as that film is already in production." Apple 2.0 says "Sorkin should have a blast" and lists three scenes from the book it can't wait to see in the movie.
eduardosaverin-pano.jpgThat's right. It's not all-Facebook-all-the-time here. We've got other stuff. Here's something about Nick Hanauer, who gave a speech at one of those thought-provoking TED conferences, but the TED bosses decided it was a little too provoking so they declined to not publish it online like all the others. "The slogan of the nonprofit group is Ideas Worth Spreading," says National Journal. "There's one idea, though, that TED's organizers decided was too controversial to spread: the notion that widening income inequality is a bad thing for America, and that as a result, the rich should pay more in taxes." Maybe they should just get Eduardo Saverin on stage to offer an opposing view.

http://www.blogs.com/2012/05/17/best-in-blogs-how-the-earthshaking-facebook-ipo-probably-will-not-affect-you.html

quinta-feira, 17 de maio de 2012

"From Me To You" - Bobby McFerrin

Boa Noite / Good Night

Adorável pecadora

Marilyn Monroe na voz de Frank Sinatra



Agosto vindouro, mês considerado aziago, Marilyn Monroe completa 50 anos desde que a morte a levou. Seus fãs, na época, ficaram consternados, pois uma mulher ainda em pleno vigor, aos 36 anos, teve fim tão prematuro. Na época, adolescente, ia completar 12 anos, mas já tinha visto vários filmes com ela, em particular Adorável pecadora (Let's make love, 1960), de George Cukor, onde faz parceria com Yves Montand, charmant ator francês em sua primeira experiência no cinema americano. Casado com Simone Signoret, ambos comunistas de carteirinha, Montand não conseguiu se abster dos encantos da atriz e teve com ela um carnal knowledge. Simone soube, mas não se separou do marido, acrescentando, apenas, mais algumas doses na sua bebedeira diária. Adorável pecadora é uma excelente comédia dirigida com a habitual competência de Cukor, um diretor de mulheres, segundo se dizia em Hollywood. Marilyn está adorável para não dizer encantadora. No vídeo aqui disposto, ela aparece em seus últimos momentos acompanhada da voz de Frank Sinatra.

Donna Summer - Last Dance - Dead At Age 63


Donna Summer (31.12.1948–17.5.2012) in memoriam

Is There Life After Disco?

Donna Summer: Is There Life After Disco?

Rolling Stone's 1978 cover story on the singer


May 17, 2012 12:35 PM ET
donna summer
Donna Summer on the cover of 'Rolling Stone.'
Photograph by Brian Leatart
This story is from the March 23rd, 1978 issue of Rolling Stone.

Until I saw Donna Summer a year ago on a Midnight Special with Lou Rawls, I'd viewed her music simply as brilliantly packaged aural sex, nothing too meaty, and, in spite of its implied intimacies, nothing too personal. But when she joined Rawls on the dais dressed like a Bloomingdale's Cleopatra, she sang probably the most affectingly full-blooded version of "Swing Low, Sweet Chariot" I'd ever heard. This wasn't the cooing voice she used on records.
The second time I saw her was on the set of the Casablanca Records and Film Works-Motown production, Thank God It's Friday. Donna was playing an aspiring singer trying to persuade a disco DJ to let her perform a song. After several rebuffs, the singer sneaks into the booth and locks the door behind her, so it's just the two of them. Then she unbuttons the top button of her blouse and fixes him with a stare from the corners of her eyes. I remember thinking it was one of the most curious expressions I'd ever seen, wide-open, withheld and coldly erotic.
But now, at Christmas time, when Donna pulls into the Casablanca Records' office of Susan Munao, wearing a billowing green velvet dress and pencil-heeled black boots, she looks neither mysterious nor erotic, just dog tired.
Her handshake is firm and her smile is friendly, but her wide eyes are bloodshot. Her tall frame is muscular and her face, framed by wavy black hair and centered with a puggish nose, is less angular than in album photos. While Munao leaves to fetch Cokes, Donna sinks into a swivel armchair with an exaggerated sigh.
In rotelike speech with an occasional Bostonian curl, Summer attributes her languor to the last two days' regimen of interviews and rehearsals. Then, without breathing space or prompting, she launches into a detailed, detached explanation of her plans for taking Once upon a Time (her latest album) to the stage in the spring. After a few minutes, Munao returns to announce that Summer's boyfriend, Michael, would like to speak to her for a moment. "He has those Christmas cards you wanted," Munao says. Michael, a tall, blond man wearing a red-and-white satin warmup jacket, saunters into the room possessively and places a card before Donna.
"No, no," she says, plucking it from his hand, "this won't do. You can't tell who's supposed to be who. Is that a cartoon of Neil Bogart [Casablanca's president] or Jeff Wald [Donna's comanager with Joyce Bogart at the time]?"
"Well, that's Neil, I guess," he says. "You can tell because he's sort of fat." Before going, Michael mentions that he'd met a psychic healer earlier in the day and asked him by Donna's later.
"Well, I don't want to see him." Donna hitches her shoulder like a kid turning down porridge.
"Believe me," he says slowly, "you want to see him. I mean, this guy has such an eerie aura about him. He told me more in fifteen minutes about what's been going down in your life and career than I could've told him."
"Oh yeah? What'd he say about my headaches and insomnia?"
Michael leans over the desk at Donna, resting his weight on his knuckles. "He said to tell you that he'll take on your pain because it won't hurt him."
"Really?" Her face brightens. "Really? Look, ask him if he'll meet with me tonight. Maybe he'll take away this negativity so I can sleep." After Michael saunters back out, I tell her it sounds as if she's going through a rough stretch. "Oh God," she says, letting out a long breath, "I can't even begin to tell you. Too much has happened lately. It seems like an absurdity. I just got back from this Italian tour that was so ill organized and badly paced that I thought I was going to break. In one airport I was so gone that they had to give me oxygen and wheel me to the plane, and all I could think was, 'I've got a show to do tonight.'
"Sometimes it gets to the point where you've been pushed for so long, by this motorous, monstrous force, this whole production of people and props that you're responsible for, by audiences and everything that rules you, until you take it upon yourself to be a machine. And at some point a machine breaks down. I feel like I want to cry most of the time and just get rid of it, but sometimes I get so pent-up, I can't. And that's when I get afraid."
Probably more than any other single personality, Donna Summer has come to represent disco artistry, a fairly enigmatic thing to epitomize. In the rigid framework of disco, the artist's role is so often reduced to that of a prop that the term "artist" hardly even applies. Few disco performers have attempted to adopt the genre to their own bents and even fewer have managed to escape it altogether. Strangely, Summer has been not only its most flagrant example of prop usage, but also the most successful at transcending the prop – and, in turn, disco itself.
In her early hits, particularly "Love to Love You Baby," Donna and her producers – Giorgio Moroder and Pete Bellotte – embellished and strengthened the prop by affording it a persona of sorts: Donna became a servile vixen with a whispery voice, intoning and moaning over a metronomic beat that had all the intensity of a sex act between consenting androids. (No less an authority than Time clocked the seventeen-minute performance at a prodigious twenty-two orgasms.) If it seemed a persona of dubious and limited worth, it nevertheless had the desired results: Donna became disco's best-known personality – one of the few to endure – and, in the bargain, one of its most consistent sellers.


Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/donna-summer-is-there-life-after-disco-20120517#ixzz1v9QKuZTa

A bed is where we let our guards down

"There’s also something incredibly sacred about a person’s bed. It’s the private space where all of us can relax and truly let our guards down — something that’s rare for celebrities who are used to being “on” all of the time. That said, we’re not immune to voyeuristic tendencies, especially when it comes to our favorite cultural icons. Perhaps that’s why we find these intimate bedroom photos of people like Andy Warhol, Patti Smith, and David Bowie so fascinating; like seeing childhood photos of these artists, there’s something about finding an image of them shot in repose that’s incredibly humanizing. It offers such a rare glimpse into their everyday lives.


Andy Warhol sitting on a bed in the 1950s. Photo attributed to Edward Wallowitch, The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh


Kurt Cobain


Patti Smith and Sam Shepard on her bed in the early ’70s. Photo credit: Judy Linn


Vladamir Nabokov writing in a notebook in his bed, 1958. Photo credit: Carl Mydans.


A 13-year-old Elizabeth Taylor in bed with her pet chipmunk, Nibbles


Bob Dylan, NYC, 1963. Photo credit: Don Hunstein. Image courtesy of Morrison Hotel Gallery


Marilyn Monroe in bed, 1962. Photo credit: George Barris.


Salvador Dalí in bed, projecting pieces of dirty paper “to stimulate his inspiration,” 1964.
© Philippe Halsman / Magnum Photos


Truman Capote, Kansas, 1967. Photo credit: Steve Schapiro.


Woody Allen writing in bed, 1996. Photo credit: Arnold Newman


David Bowie, 1969. ©Ray Stevenson


Madonna, NYC, ’80s.


Ernest Hemingway reading The New York Times in bed. Photo credit: George Leavens


Georgia O’Keeffe at her ranch home, 1966. Photo Credit: John Loengard.


William S. Burroughs, Paris, 1959. Photo credit: Loomis Dean.


http://flavorwire.com/229669/photos-of-cultural-icons-snapped-in-their-own-beds#15

Onde está a Verdade?

A história que a Comissão da Verdade precisa contar

José Antonio Lima
 
Dilma e os ex-presidentes Lula, Fernando Collor, José Sarney e Fernando Henrique. Foto: Ricardo Stuckert / Instituto Lula
Dilma e os ex-presidentes Lula, Fernando Collor, José Sarney e Fernando Henrique. Foto: Ricardo Stuckert / Instituto Lula
 
A presidenta Dilma Rousseff, ao lado dos quatro ex-presidentes da República vivos, instalou nesta quarta-feira 16 a Comissão da Verdade, cujo objetivo, exposto na lei 12.528, é “examinar e esclarecer graves violações de direitos humanos” praticadas entre 1946 e 1988. Antes mesmo de sua instalação, a comissão se viu envolta em uma celeuma: a comissão deve focar apenas as violações cometidas por agentes do estado ou também ofensas aos direitos humanos realizadas por determinados setores da luta armada? Esta discussão é torta, deslocada da realidade e encontra suas raízes numa interpretação falsa do que houve em 1964.
A polêmica deriva da falta de precisão do texto que cria a comissão e não estabelece claramente qual é seu “alvo”. Assim, cabe aos integrantes da comissão decidir a forma como ela deve atuar. O advogado José Carlos Dias, ex-ministro da Justiça no governo Fernando Henrique Cardoso, disse inicialmente, à Folha de S.Paulo, que “tudo” seria analisado. No dia seguinte, ao Estado de S.Paulo, afirmou que o objetivo principal da comissão seria investigar as violações de direitos humanos cometidos por agentes de Estado. Companheiros de Dias discordam dele. Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, ministro de Direitos Humanos no governo FHC, afirmou que o “único lado” é o das vítimas de violações praticadas por agentes do Estado. A professora e advogada Rosa Cardoso, defensora de Dilma quando a presidenta foi presa e torturada nos 1970, concordou com Pinheiro.
A discussão fez dois ex-ministros trocarem acusações. Nelson Jobim, ministro da Defesa nos governos Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva e Dilma, alardeou um acordo supostamente firmado na época da redação do texto. Segundo Jobim, o acordo previa que ações da esquerda armada também seriam investigadas. Paulo Vannuchi, ex-ministro da secretaria de Direitos Humanos da Presidência, acusou Jobim de mentir.
A postura de Jobim ecoa as posições de alguns setores militares. O general da reserva Marco Antônio Felício da Silva, afirmou ao Estado de S.Paulo que o objetivo da comissão é colocar os grupos armados “como democratas e defensores da liberdade e dos direitos humanos quando, no passado, desejavam a derrubada do governo e a instalação de uma ditadura do proletariado por meio da luta armada, usando do terrorismo”. O que está por trás deste tipo de pensamento? Não é preciso ter dúvidas. Para muitos brasileiros, incluindo diversos militares, o que ocorreu em 31 de março de 1964 foi correto. Foi, para eles, não um golpe, mas sim uma revolução para impedir a suposta tomada de poder por comunistas. Essa versão serve para esconder o fato de que o golpe foi um levante, militar e civil, apoiado inclusive por empresários e veículos de comunicação, contra um governo frágil e de pouca habilidade política cuja atuação indicava a redução de privilégios de algumas das elites nacionais.

http://www.cartacapital.com.br/sociedade/a-historia-que-a-comissao-da-verdade-precisa-contar/


Comissão da Verdade

Maria Rita Kehl integrará Comissão da Verdade: leia textos da psicanalista sobre a ditadura militar brasileira

A psicanlista Maria Rita Kehl, autora de diversas obras publicadas pela editora, foi nomeada integrante da Comissão da Verdade. A lista com os nomes dos sete integrantes escolhidos pela presidenta Dilma Rousseff foi divulgada ontem e publicada hoje no Diário Oficial da União. Além de Maria Rita Kehl, integrarão a comissão José Carlos Dias (ex-ministro da Justiça no governo Fernando Henrique Cardoso), Gilson Dipp (ministro do STJ e do TSE), Rosa Maria Cardoso da Cunha (advogada), Cláudio Fonteles (ex-procurador-geral da República no governo Lula), José Paulo Cavalcanti Filho (advogado e escritor) e Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro (atual presidente da Comissão Internacional Independente de Investigação da ONU para a Síria). A Comissão da Verdade trabalhará por dois anos (a partir de sua posse, marcada para a próxima quarta-feira, 16 de maio) com a finalidade de investigar e narrar violações dos direitos humanos ocorridas no Brasil durante o período de 1946 a 1988.
Maria Rita Kehl foi jornalista entre 1974 e 1981, tendo publicado artigos em diversos jornais e revistas de São Paulo e do Rio de Janeiro. Editou a seção de cultura nos jornais Movimento e Em Tempo, periódicos de oposição à ditadura militar. É formada em psicologia pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP) onde realizou pesquisa de mestrado em psicologia social, com a dissertação “O Papel da Rede Globo e das Novelas da Globo em Domesticar o Brasil Durante a Ditadura Militar”, e doutora em psicanálise pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP). Atua desde 1981 como psicanalista em clínica de adultos em São Paulo e, desde 2006, na Escola Nacional Florestan Fernandes (ENFF), do Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra (MST), em Guararema (SP). É autora de O tempo e o cão (Boitempo, 2009), ganhador do prêmio Jabuti de Melhor Livro do Ano de Não Ficção em 2010; da coletânea de crônicas e artigos 18 crônicas e mais algumas (Boitempo, 2011) e Videologias: ensaios sobre a televisão (Boitempo, 2004 – em coautoria com Eugênio Bucci), entre outros. É colunista esporádica do Blog da Boitempo.
Além de ter atuado em movimentos de contestação e resistência ao regime militar, Maria Rita Kehl tem desempenhado papel de destaque na crítica do processo unilateral de reconciliação promovido pelo Estado através da Lei da Anistia (de 1979), defendendo a necessidade da reelaboração do passado histórico pela sociedade brasileira. Segundo ela, os crimes cometidos pelo regime militar e recalcados socialmente pela Anistia influem diretamente nas práticas de corrupção e, sobretudo, de violência exercida pelos agentes do Estado atualmente. Segundo estudos, o fato de o Brasil não ter julgado os crimes cometidos pelo Estado durante o regime militar está diretamente relacionado com o fato de ser um dos únicos países no mundo em que a violência policial só aumentou após o fim de um período de ditadura.
A Boitempo Editorial publicou em 2010 a coletânea O que resta da ditadura: a exceção brasileira, organizada por Edson Teles e Vladimir Safatle. O livro reúne uma série de estudos que apresentam diversas perspectivas para as reminiscências da ditadura militar no Brasil contemporâneo. Dentre eles, está o ensaio “Tortura e sintoma social”, escrito por Maria Rita Kehl. Confira abaixo o início do texo:
Em um livro escrito em 2004 [Ressentimento, São Paulo, Casa do Psicólogo] eu me referi ao ressentimento como um dos sintomas mais representativos da relação ambivalente da sociedade brasileira com os poderes que, em tese, deveriam representar e defender interesses coletivos. Fruto dos abusos históricos que aparentemente “perdoamos” sem exigir que opressores e agressores pedissem perdão e reparassem os danos causados, o ressentimento instalou-se na sociedade brasileira como forma de “revolta passiva” (Bourdieu) ou “vingança adiada” (Nietzsche), ao sinalizar uma covarde cumplicidade dos ofendidos e oprimidos com seus ofensores/opressores. A magoa ”irreparável” do ressentido indica que ele sabe, mas não quer saber, que aceitou se colocar em uma condição passiva diante dos abusos do mais forte; por covardia, por cálculo (“mais tarde ele há de reconhecer e premiar meu sacrifício”) ou por impotência autoimposta, o ressentido acaba por se revelar cúmplice do agravo que o vitimou.
É importante ressaltar, entretanto, que o ressentimento não abate aqueles que foram derrotados na luta e no enfrentamento com o opressor, e sim os que recuaram sem lutar e perdoaram sem exigir reparação. O expediente corriqueiro – por má-fé ou mal-entendido? – de chamar de “ressentidos” aqueles que não desistiram de lutar por seus direitos e pela reparação das injustiças sofridas não passa de uma forma de desqualificar a luta política em nome de uma paz social imposta de cima para baixo. Nossa tradicional cordialidade, no sentido que Sérgio Buarque de Hollanda tomou emprestado de Ribeiro Couto, obscurece a luta de classes e desvirtua a gravidade dos conflitos desde o período colonial.
***
Recomendamos também a leitura de dois textos escritos pela psicanalista e publicados no Blog da Boitempo:
Mulher ou militante (publicado originalmente na revista CartaCapital), acerca da importância da eleição de Dilma Rousseff como ex-presa política torturada durante a ditadura militar;
Comentários sobre K., de Bernardo Kucinski, sobre o romance que investiga o passado histórico do país através da história da busca de um pai pela filha, desaparecida durante o regime militar.
ebooks
Todos os livros de Maria Rita Kehl publicados pela Boitempo estão à venda em versão eletrônica (ebook), custando metade do preço dos livros impressos

Dama do Cassino - Jussara Silveira